FAI 70 FR RD 29.27 over Trib to Sugar Creek


+38.80381, -89.59481
38°48'14" N, 89°35'41" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAI 70 FR RD 29.27 over Trib to Sugar Creek
Structure number:003200200000000
Old structure number:000003200222188 (from 1992 edition)
Location:1.25M N PIERRON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:600 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.5 tons [25.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.6

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
December 201692.6Good7 out of 10-600
December 201492.6Good7 out of 10-500
December 201294.4Good7 out of 10-500
December 201094.8Good7 out of 10-500
December 200894.8Good7 out of 10-500
December 200694.8Good7 out of 10-500
January 200694.8Good7 out of 10-500
January 200494.8Good7 out of 10-800
January 200294.8Good7 out of 10-800
January 200094.8Good7 out of 10-800
200094.8Good7 out of 10-450
January 199894.8Good7 out of 10-450
February 199694.8Good7 out of 10-350
February 1994100.0Good7 out of 10-350
January 1992100.0Good7 out of 10-350