Share:

CHINATOWN RAMP NB over I- 55 STEVENSON

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.84728, -87.63112
41°50'50" N, 87°37'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CHINATOWN RAMP NB over I- 55 STEVENSON
Structure number:016027100000000
Old structure number:000016027104027 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.7 M E I-94
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Total length:503.0 ft. [153.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:43.3 ft. [13.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:46.6 ft. [14.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1965
Year reconstructed:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:33,400 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:76.2 tons [69.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.0 tons [41.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:91.1
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$1,356,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201691.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO33400
November 201491.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO33400
January 201395.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO2750
February 201195.8GoodGoodGoodGood-1375
March 200994.8GoodVery GoodGoodGood-8050
May 200794.8GoodVery GoodGoodGood-8050
January 200693.8GoodVery GoodGoodGood-14650
February 200493.8FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGood-14650
October 200293.8FairVery GoodSatisfactoryGoodFO14650
December 200160.6PoorPoorPoorPoorSD14650
February 200161.9PoorPoorPoorPoorSD8750
200061.9PoorPoorPoorPoorSD8750
July 199861.9PoorPoorPoorPoorSD8750
October 199780.5FairFairFairFairFO8750
May 199680.5FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO8750
January 199580.4FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO8750
September 199380.4FairFairSatisfactoryFairFO8750
October 199291.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO8750
August 199191.6FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO8750