Share:

FAS 355, CH 16 over WATERWAY

Map

Coordinates:
+41.01179, -88.87324
41°00'42" N, 88°52'24" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:FAS 355, CH 16 over WATERWAY
Structure number:053500900000000
Old structure number:000053500928914 (from 1992 edition)
Location:2670N,300E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:8.2 ft. [2.5 m]
Total length:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1991
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:600 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Culvert condition:No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:48.8 tons [44.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.9

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
March 201599.9Good8 out of 10-600
March 201199.9Good8 out of 10-900
February 200799.9Good8 out of 10-900
December 200299.9Good9 out of 10-700
October 199899.9Good9 out of 10-750
May 199499.9Good9 out of 10-750
June 199299.9Good9 out of 10-650
November 199199.9Good9 out of 10-650