+40.25051, -89.38114
40°15'02" N, 89°22'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CH 18 over SUGAR CK TRIB
Structure number:054391100000000
Old structure number:000054391112764 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Total length:30.2 ft. [9.2 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:225 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:33.1 tons [30.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.9 tons [18.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:81.4

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
January 201681.4Fair6 out of 10-225
February 201481.4Good7 out of 10-225
February 201092.4Good7 out of 10-375
January 200692.5Good7 out of 10-300
January 200492.5Good7 out of 10-300
January 200292.5Good7 out of 10-300
February 200092.5Good7 out of 10-300
200092.5Good7 out of 10-300
February 199892.4Good7 out of 10-359
February 199692.5Good7 out of 10-359
March 199492.5Good7 out of 10-359
January 199392.5Good7 out of 10-359
March 199192.5Good7 out of 10-359