TR 32(ARCHERY CLUB over MOSQUITO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.72364, -89.1029839°43'25" N, 89°06'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | TR 32(ARCHERY CLUB over MOSQUITO CREEK |
Structure number: | 058309800000000 |
Old structure number: | 000058309813849 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1.9 MI NE BLUE MOUND |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 70.2 ft. [21.4 m] |
Total length: | 71.2 ft. [21.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1909 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2005] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 49.4 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $160,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 25 | 49.4 |
February 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 25 | 49.4 |
February 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 25 | 49.4 |
February 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 25 | 46.2 |
January 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 25 | 45.8 |
August 2007 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 25 | 45.8 |
January 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 25 | 45.8 |
January 2004 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 150 | 27.5 |
February 2002 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 150 | 42.5 |
February 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 25 | 46.5 |
August 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 25 | 44.5 |
July 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 25 | 44.5 |
December 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 59 | 43.0 |
December 1992 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 59 | 29.0 |
February 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 59 | 29.0 |
April 1988 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 25 | 46.5 |