US 136 over ROSS DITCH


+39.88167, -86.54000
39°52'54" N, 86°32'24" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US 136 over ROSS DITCH
Structure number:026920
Location:00.29 E SR 39
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Total length:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.3 ft. [13.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:48.2 ft. [14.7 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,007 [as of 2004]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:92.8 tons [84.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:46.9 tons [42.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:98.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$593,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
November 201698.9GoodGoodGoodGood-3007
March 201598.9GoodGoodGoodGood-3007
March 201398.9FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-3007
April 201198.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-3007
April 200998.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-3007
April 200799.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-3007
April 200598.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-3007
April 200398.9GoodVery GoodGoodGood-2948
April 200198.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-2948
September 199999.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-2287
August 199799.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-2287
August 199599.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-2231
March 199449.4PoorPoorSeriousSatisfactorySD2500
February 199249.4PoorPoorSeriousSatisfactorySD2500
June 198946.7PoorPoorSeriousSatisfactorySD2500