Share: 
CR 1025N over LITTLE ROCK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.69499, -86.55678
40°41'42" N, 86°33'24" W
+40.69499, -86.55678
40°41'42" N, 86°33'24" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR 1025N over LITTLE ROCK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 0800107 |
| Location: | 00.02 W of CR 175 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Total length: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Main span material: | Masonry [8] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 181 [as of 2011] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2017 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 181 | 65.9 |
| July 2015 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 181 | 65.9 |
| July 2013 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 181 | 65.9 |
| July 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 181 | 65.9 |
| August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 174 | 65.9 |
| August 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 174 | 65.9 |
| August 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 171 | 65.9 |
| May 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 170 | 57.6 |
| May 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 163 | 57.6 |
| March 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 163 | 57.9 |
| February 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 163 | 57.6 |
| October 1994 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 150 | 47.1 |
| January 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 150 | 55.1 |
| February 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 200 | 70.7 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1169416
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1169416