Share: 
SPICELAND ROAD over BRANCH OF BIG BLUE RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+39.84364, -85.43984
39°50'37" N, 85°26'23" W
+39.84364, -85.43984
39°50'37" N, 85°26'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SPICELAND ROAD over BRANCH OF BIG BLUE RIVER |
| Structure number: | 3300121 |
| Location: | 00.30 N OF CR 650 S |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 10° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2001 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9] |
| Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 400 [as of 2018] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $250,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2018 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 400 | 69.9 |
| July 2017 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 400 | 69.9 |
| July 2016 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 400 | 69.9 |
| July 2015 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 400 | 67.9 |
| March 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 83.9 |
| July 2011 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 400 | 94.9 |
| August 2009 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 400 | 95.9 |
| August 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 400 | 95.9 |
| July 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 400 | 95.9 |
| July 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 400 | 93.4 |
| August 2001 | Fair | N out of 10 | 385 | 55.3 |
| May 1999 | Fair | N out of 10 | 325 | 54.3 |
| April 1997 | Fair | N out of 10 | 325 | 54.3 |
| April 1995 | Fair | N out of 10 | 325 | 55.3 |
| April 1993 | Fair | N out of 10 | 325 | 55.3 |
| April 1991 | Fair | N out of 10 | 300 | 50.1 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1173061
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1173061