Share:

SOUTH ALLEY over CEDAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+41.29081, -87.42203
41°17'27" N, 87°25'19" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SOUTH ALLEY over CEDAR CREEK
Structure number:4500163
Location:00.10 S.E. of SR 2
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:308 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:69.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$58,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2016FairFairFairSatisfactory30869.6
September 2014FairFairFairSatisfactory30869.6
September 2012FairFairFairSatisfactory30869.6
September 2010FairFairFairSatisfactory65079.4
October 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair65080.4
August 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair62580.4
August 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory60091.4
August 2002FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory60080.4
August 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory60092.4
August 1998FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory60092.4
June 1996FairGoodGoodSatisfactory60091.4
July 1994FairGoodGoodSatisfactory60091.5
July 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60092.5
July 1990GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60092.5