Share:

CR 500N over BRANCH OF BLACK CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+40.11139, -86.95417
40°06'41" N, 86°57'15" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 500N over BRANCH OF BLACK CREEK
Structure number:5400046
Location:00.10 E of CR 275W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Total length:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:60 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
April 201696.0Good7 out of 10-60
April 201496.0Good7 out of 10-60
June 201295.0Good7 out of 10-62
July 201095.0Good7 out of 10-60
May 200895.0Good7 out of 10-50
May 200695.0Good7 out of 10-50
June 200495.0Good7 out of 10-50
May 200295.0Good7 out of 10-50
May 200097.0Good7 out of 10-50
July 199897.0Good7 out of 10-50
September 199621.2PoorN out of 10SD32
October 199421.3PoorN out of 10SD32
January 199219.1PoorN out of 10SD100
March 199023.1PoorN out of 10SD100