Share:

CR 875E over BRANCH OF SUGAR CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+40.06361, -86.73833
40°03'49" N, 86°44'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 875E over BRANCH OF SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:5400202
Location:00.10 N of CR 15N
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1998
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9]
Main span design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:60 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
April 201696.0Good7 out of 10-60
April 201499.0Good7 out of 10-60
June 201298.0Good8 out of 10-62
July 201096.0Good7 out of 10-60
May 200896.0Good7 out of 10-50
May 200696.0Good7 out of 10-50
May 200496.0Good7 out of 10-50
April 200296.0Good7 out of 10-50
May 2000100.0Good7 out of 10-50
June 1998100.0Good7 out of 10-50