Share:

CR 400S over AGNEW DITCH

Map

Coordinates:
+40.99723, -86.65698
40°59'50" N, 86°39'25" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 400S over AGNEW DITCH
Structure number:6600081
Location:00.83 W OF CR 200 W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:70 [as of 2018]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:95.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
September 2018Good7 out of 107095.0
September 2016Good7 out of 107096.0
September 2014Good7 out of 107096.0
October 2012Good7 out of 107096.0
January 2011Good8 out of 106096.0
November 2008Good8 out of 106096.0
November 2006Good8 out of 106099.0
November 2004Good8 out of 1060100.0
November 2002Good8 out of 1060100.0
October 2000Good8 out of 1060100.0
October 1998Good8 out of 1060100.0
September 1996Good8 out of 1035100.0
September 1994Good8 out of 1035100.0
August 1992Good9 out of 1035100.0
August 1990PoorN out of 1010024.9