Share: 
CR 850W over Lost Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+40.37846, -87.06406
40°22'42" N, 87°03'51" W
+40.37846, -87.06406
40°22'42" N, 87°03'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CR 850W over Lost Creek |
| Structure number: | 7900055 |
| Location: | 00.30 N of CR 300S |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 6.9 ft. [2.1 m] |
| Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1998 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 31 [as of 2003] |
| Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 31 | 100.0 |
| October 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 31 | 100.0 |
| October 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 31 | 100.0 |
| November 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 31 | 100.0 |
| October 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 31 | 100.0 |
| December 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 31 | 100.0 |
| November 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 29 | 100.0 |
| November 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 29 | 100.0 |
| November 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 29 | 100.0 |
| December 1998 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 29 | 100.0 |
| August 1996 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 44.2 |
| September 1994 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 43.2 |
| July 1992 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 43.2 |
| August 1990 | Poor | N out of 10 | 100 | 43.2 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1179284
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1179284