Share: 
BIXLER RD over BIG CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.15431, -87.64789
38°09'16" N, 87°38'52" W
+38.15431, -87.64789
38°09'16" N, 87°38'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | BIXLER RD over BIG CREEK |
| Structure number: | 8200010 |
| Location: | 00.10 N OF MANN RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.6 ft. [7.8 m] |
| Total length: | 101.4 ft. [30.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1995 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 64 [as of 2018] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 97.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 64 | 97.0 |
| October 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 58 | 97.0 |
| October 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 112 | 93.0 |
| November 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 112 | 94.0 |
| November 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 112 | 94.0 |
| November 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 112 | 91.0 |
| December 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 109 | 89.5 |
| October 2004 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 95.0 |
| September 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 95.0 |
| May 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 95.0 |
| May 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 100 | 95.0 |
| November 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 100 | 100.0 |
| November 1993 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 30.9 |
| April 1991 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 20 | 29.7 |
| February 1989 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 100 | 25.6 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1179564
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1179564