N CHIPPEWA ST over EEL RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+40.91556, -85.9242540°54'56" N, 85°55'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | N CHIPPEWA ST over EEL RIVER |
Structure number: | 8500045 |
Location: | 00.10 N OF STATE RD 16 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 123.0 ft. [37.5 m] |
Total length: | 303.2 ft. [92.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1877 |
Year reconstructed: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 20.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,001,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 20.9 |
May 2017 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 20.9 |
May 2016 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 20.9 |
May 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 22.9 |
May 2014 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 100 | 22.9 |
May 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 35.5 |
May 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 35.3 |
March 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 20.9 |
May 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 20.9 |
June 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 32.6 |
May 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 32.6 |
May 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 20.9 |
August 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 32.6 |
March 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 25.6 |
May 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 25.7 |
July 1992 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 25.7 |
July 1990 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | 37.8 |