Share: 
Foxtail Rd. over MULBERRY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.86627, -95.65813
39°51'59" N, 95°39'29" W
+39.86627, -95.65813
39°51'59" N, 95°39'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Foxtail Rd. over MULBERRY CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000070999003183 |
| Location: | 3.4E 1.7N OF FAIRVIEW |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 89.9 ft. [27.4 m] |
| Total length: | 131.9 ft. [40.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1935 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Gravel [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 2016] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 68.3 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $550,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 68.3 |
| October 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 68.3 |
| May 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 68.3 |
| April 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 68.3 |
| March 2012 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 44.1 |
| February 2010 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 43.1 |
| February 2008 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 43.1 |
| November 2005 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 47.1 |
| February 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.1 |
| December 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.1 |
| December 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.4 |
| May 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.1 |
| February 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.1 |
| June 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.1 |
| May 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 40 | 48.1 |
| September 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 40 | 38.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1187791
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1187791