NE 150 A. II.0-6.3 over NESTER CREEK


+37.65700, -97.84400
37°39'25" N, 97°50'38" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NE 150 A. II.0-6.3 over NESTER CREEK
Structure number:000480765006223
Location:4.3S OF MT. VERNON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Total length:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1986
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:97.0

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2017Good7 out of 101097.0
January 2015Good7 out of 101097.0
January 2013Good8 out of 101097.0
January 2011Good8 out of 101097.0
March 2009Good8 out of 101097.0
January 2007Good8 out of 101097.0
January 2005Good8 out of 101097.0
March 2003Good8 out of 101097.0
December 2000Good8 out of 101097.0
January 1997Good8 out of 101097.0
December 1994Good8 out of 101097.0
August 1992Good8 out of 1010100.0
August 1990Good9 out of 101097.1