LOCAL 40 J.4-1780 over NEOSHO RIVER
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+38.76859, -96.6752438°46'07" N, 96°40'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LOCAL 40 J.4-1780 over NEOSHO RIVER |
Structure number: | 000640893204705 |
Location: | S. OF PARKERVILLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 67.9 ft. [20.7 m] |
Total length: | 67.9 ft. [20.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2011] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 24.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $87,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
February 2016 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 70 | 24.2 |
November 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 70 | 34.0 |
January 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
October 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
March 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
August 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
November 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
June 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 61.3 |
February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.3 |
January 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.3 |
March 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.7 |
February 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.7 |
June 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.3 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.3 |
July 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 61.3 |