LOCAL 40 J.4-1780 over NEOSHO RIVER

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.


+38.76859, -96.67524
38°46'07" N, 96°40'31" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LOCAL 40 J.4-1780 over NEOSHO RIVER
Structure number:000640893204705
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Total length:67.9 ft. [20.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Historic significance:Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:70 [as of 2011]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:24.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$87,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2016PoorFairPoorPoor7024.2
November 2013FairSatisfactoryFairFair7034.0
January 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
October 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
March 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
December 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
August 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
November 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
June 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7061.3
February 2003GoodGoodGoodGood7061.3
January 2001GoodGoodGoodGood7061.3
March 1999GoodGoodGoodGood7061.7
February 1997GoodGoodGoodGood7061.7
June 1995GoodGoodGoodGood7061.3
November 1993GoodGoodGoodGood7061.3
July 1991GoodGoodGoodGood7061.3