W 269TH ST 54 over MUTE CREEK
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+38.57937, -95.8183738°34'46" N, 95°49'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | W 269TH ST 54 over MUTE CREEK |
Structure number: | 000700983104960 |
Location: | 3.0S 1.2E OF OSAGE CITY |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 41.7 ft. [12.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1910 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2014
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 40 [as of 2013] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 18.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $330,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2014 | - | - | - | - | 40 | 18.9 |
December 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 40 | 20.8 |
November 2012 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 40 | 20.8 |
May 2011 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 40 | 20.8 |
May 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 40 | 20.8 |
January 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 40 | 22.9 |
December 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 40 | 22.9 |
December 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 40 | 23.9 |
February 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 40 | 23.9 |
March 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 40 | 23.9 |
January 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 40 | 23.9 |
February 1995 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 40 | 23.9 |
November 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 40 | 23.9 |
December 1990 | Poor | Imminent Failure | Poor | Imminent Failure | 40 | 16.5 |