LOCAL RD. T-18.8 over RILEY CREEK
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+39.74022, -97.5992239°44'25" N, 97°35'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LOCAL RD. T-18.8 over RILEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000790791803360 |
Location: | 6.0S 1.8E OF BELLEVILLE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 38.4 ft. [11.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1910 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2016
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2014] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 20.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $270,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2016 | - | - | - | - | 10 | 20.0 |
September 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | - | Poor | 10 | 25.0 |
October 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Poor | 10 | 25.0 |
August 2013 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 25.0 |
August 2012 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 25.0 |
September 2011 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 25.0 |
October 2010 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 25.0 |
October 2008 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 24.5 |
October 2007 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 24.0 |
October 2006 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 24.0 |
October 2004 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 24.0 |
October 2002 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 24.0 |
September 2000 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 10 | 24.0 |
December 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 35.5 |
January 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 10 | 33.3 |
March 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 34.3 |
March 1993 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Satisfactory | 10 | 25.0 |
March 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 10 | 30.3 |