Share:

DONOHOO STREET over CONNOR CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.15892, -94.81774
39°09'32" N, 94°49'04" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:DONOHOO STREET over CONNOR CREEK
Structure number:514301050000083
Location:10500 DONAHOO
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Total length:52.5 ft. [16.0 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,230 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:84.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
April 201584.7Good7 out of 10-1230
May 201384.4Good7 out of 10-2200
March 201199.5Good8 out of 10-2200
March 200999.5Good8 out of 10-2200
March 200715.0PoorN out of 10SD200
March 200515.2PoorN out of 10SD180
October 200115.2PoorN out of 10SD180
November 199915.2PoorN out of 10SD180
August 199715.6FairN out of 10SD136
November 199515.7FairN out of 10SD136
November 199315.7PoorN out of 10SD136
August 199114.9PoorN out of 10SD220