Share:

CESSNA DRIVE over DRY CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.64885, -97.29603
37°38'56" N, 97°17'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CESSNA DRIVE over DRY CREEK
Structure number:53040087000DC40
Location:CESSNA DR AT ROOSEVELT
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:250 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:57.9 tons [52.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.0 tons [31.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
December 201599.8Fair6 out of 10-250
November 201399.8Good7 out of 10-250
September 201196.8Fair6 out of 10-250
November 200996.8Good7 out of 10-250
July 200797.8Good7 out of 10-250
November 200299.3Good7 out of 10-235
February 200099.3Good8 out of 10-235
March 199799.3Good8 out of 10-225
January 199599.2Good8 out of 10-219
May 1993100.0Good8 out of 10-219
May 1991100.0Good8 out of 10-219