Share:

HYDRAULIC AVENUE over MID FORK CHISHOLM CR.

Map

Coordinates:
+37.75786, -97.31747
37°45'28" N, 97°19'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:HYDRAULIC AVENUE over MID FORK CHISHOLM CR.
Structure number:530400878236086
Location:HYDRAULIC AT 39TH. ST. N.
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Total length:181.1 ft. [55.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1957
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:4,500 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.6

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201576.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO4500
October 201376.6FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO4500
October 201177.6FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO4500
November 200977.6FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO4500
May 200779.6GoodExcellentVery GoodVery GoodFO4500
November 200281.1FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO2416
February 200081.0FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO2416
March 199782.1GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO2280
January 199578.2GoodGoodVery GoodVery GoodFO2734
May 199366.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO2734
May 199181.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-1943