Share:

I-35 HWY NB (KTA) over MACARTHUR RD

Map 

Coordinates:
+37.62266, -97.30477
37°37'22" N, 97°18'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I-35 HWY NB (KTA) over MACARTHUR RD
Structure number:999903500872393
Location:1.60 MI NE I-135
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Tolls:Yes, on toll road [2]
Length of largest span:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Total length:164.4 ft. [50.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Skew angle:48°
Owner:State Toll Authority [31]
Year built:1956
Year reconstructed:1978
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,450 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:16% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:56.9 tons [51.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.1 tons [31.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:83.7
Recommended work:Bridge deck replacement with only incidental widening. [37]
Estimated cost of work:$182,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201583.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6450
September 201382.7FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6450
June 201280.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO5750
July 201180.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6060
June 201080.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6060
June 200980.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6050
June 200880.6FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6350
April 200780.6FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6350
July 200680.6FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6325
June 200580.6FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO6400
June 200480.6FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO6450
June 200381.2FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO6300
July 200281.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6175
May 200181.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6150
May 200081.2GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6415
June 199980.5GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6415
June 199880.5GoodGoodGoodGoodFO6160
June 199780.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO5620
July 199680.6GoodGoodGoodGoodFO5345
June 199481.5GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO5415
May 199384.6GoodGoodGoodVery Good-4075
June 199281.6GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO4455
August 199177.7GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO4075