4TH STREET over CLARK'S RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+37.63611, -84.7744437°38'10" N, 84°46'28" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | 4TH STREET over CLARK'S RUN |
Structure number: | 011B00047N |
Old structure number: | 011*0127*B0047 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1.3 MI. NOR.JCT.US 127 BP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 64.6 ft. [19.7 m] |
Total length: | 69.9 ft. [21.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 38.7 ft. [11.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 50° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1983 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,174 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 75.5 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $341,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 8174 | 75.5 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7977 | 75.6 |
October 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 7977 | 75.6 |
October 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7770 | 76.6 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8790 | 76.3 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8720 | 76.3 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8650 | 76.4 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8775 | 76.3 |
October 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 21090 | 72.5 |
October 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 21090 | 72.5 |
October 1998 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 21090 | 72.5 |
October 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 21090 | 72.5 |
October 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11600 | 75.6 |
October 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11600 | 75.6 |
October 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11600 | 76.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 350 | 349 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,712 | 2,688 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 221 | 195 | 21 | 5 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 148 | 144 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 140 | 139 | 0 | 1 | 0 |