CRAINTOWN ROAD over BEGLEY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.64417, -85.0044437°38'39" N, 85°00'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CRAINTOWN ROAD over BEGLEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 011C00046N |
Location: | .3 MI S OF JCT US 150 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.5 ft. [9.0 m] |
Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1988 |
Year reconstructed: | 2014 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 258 [as of 2006] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $68,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 258 | 78.0 |
September 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 258 | 78.0 |
June 2015 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 258 | 78.0 |
January 2015 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 258 | 78.0 |
October 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Good | 258 | 42.1 |
October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 258 | 55.1 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 258 | 55.1 |
October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 262 | 55.1 |
October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 150 | 62.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 224 | 0 | 224 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 54 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Open Grid Deck | sq. ft. | 588 | 0 | 588 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 66 | 66 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 330 | 330 | 0 | 0 | 0 |