Share: 
CASH ROAD over BR - CHAPLIN CK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.60833, -84.91167
37°36'30" N, 84°54'42" W
+37.60833, -84.91167
37°36'30" N, 84°54'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CASH ROAD over BR - CHAPLIN CK |
| Structure number: | 011C00065N |
| Location: | .9 MI N OF OLD MTCHBUR |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 26.6 ft. [8.1 m] |
| Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1997 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 2006] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 87.8 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 70 | 87.8 |
| September 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 70 | 87.8 |
| September 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 70 | 89.8 |
| October 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 87.8 |
| October 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 94.0 |
| October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 70 | 94.0 |
| October 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 72 | 94.0 |
| October 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 94.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 180 | 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 728 | 707 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 100 | 93 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 90 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 280 | 280 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1207881
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1207881