Share: 
JERRY WRIGHT RD over BRUSH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.93889, -84.38333
38°56'20" N, 84°22'60" W
+38.93889, -84.38333
38°56'20" N, 84°22'60" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | JERRY WRIGHT RD over BRUSH CREEK |
| Structure number: | 019C00017N |
| Location: | .5 MI SW OF JCT KY 1121 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.4 ft. [5.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1965 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 440 [as of 2006] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 63.4 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $74,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 440 | 63.4 |
| January 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 440 | 65.0 |
| January 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 440 | 65.0 |
| January 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 440 | 41.1 |
| March 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 440 | 41.1 |
| April 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 440 | 41.1 |
| May 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 150 | 48.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 210 | 198 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 595 | 595 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 545 | 486 | 59 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 74 | 0 | 64 | 9 | 1 |
| Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 21 | 9 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 60 | 17 | 35 | 4 | 4 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 300 | 0 | 0 | 300 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1208735
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1208735