Share: 
BRADSHAW RD over BACK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.70778, -84.48028
37°42'28" N, 84°28'49" W
+37.70778, -84.48028
37°42'28" N, 84°28'49" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | BRADSHAW RD over BACK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 040C00008N |
| Location: | 100 FT E TEATERSVILLE RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 8.5 ft. [2.6 m] |
| Total length: | 82.0 ft. [25.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 8 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2012] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 47.5 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $121,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2017 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 47.5 |
| February 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 94 | 44.1 |
| November 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 94 | 44.1 |
| November 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 94 | 44.1 |
| November 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 94 | 44.1 |
| October 2007 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 96 | 18.1 |
| November 2005 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 60 | 20.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 84 | 72 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 24 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 984 | 0 | 654 | 330 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211177
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211177