Share: 
SCOTTS FORK RD over SCOTTS FORK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.70778, -84.52528
37°42'28" N, 84°31'31" W
+37.70778, -84.52528
37°42'28" N, 84°31'31" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SCOTTS FORK RD over SCOTTS FORK |
| Structure number: | 040C00041N |
| Location: | 1.3 MI W JCT KY 39 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
| Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1991 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 75 [as of 2006] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $93,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 75 | 75.8 |
| February 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 73.8 |
| November 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 75 | 62.9 |
| November 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 75 | 59.4 |
| November 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 75 | 59.4 |
| October 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 76 | 59.4 |
| November 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 50 | 49.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 204 | 204 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Prestressed Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 617 | 617 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 442 | 442 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 72 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 67 | 50 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 68 | 0 | 68 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 340 | 0 | 0 | 340 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211186
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211186