US-68 over GREASY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+37.15167, -85.56111
37°09'06" N, 85°33'40" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	US-68 over GREASY CREEK
Structure number:	044B00013N
Old structure number:	0440068B0013 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	1.5 MI S.W. OF JCT KY 487
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	40.0 ft. `[12.2 m]`
Total length:	44.0 ft. `[13.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	19.0 ft. `[5.8 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	22.0 ft. `[6.7 m]`
Skew angle:	30°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1933
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Tee beam `[04]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	860 `[as of 2016]`
Truck traffic:	11% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	59.4
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. `[34]`
Estimated cost of work:	$126,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
October 2018	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	860	59.4
October 2017	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	860	53.3
October 2016	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	986	52.9
October 2015	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	986	52.9
October 2014	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	986	52.9
October 2013	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	880	53.2
October 2012	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	862	53.3
October 2011	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	831	53.4
October 2010	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	866	53.3
October 2009	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	921	53.1
November 2008	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	922	53.1
October 2007	Fair	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	922	53.1
October 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	838	66.0
October 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	964	65.3
October 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	964	63.3
October 2000	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Satisfactory	964	63.3
October 1998	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	964	63.3
October 1996	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	964	63.3
October 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	944	63.4
October 1994	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	944	56.4
October 1993	Good	Good	Good	Good	944	56.4
October 1992	Good	Good	Good	Good	944	56.4
October 1991	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	944	56.4

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	176	0	88	88	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	968	0	803	165	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	841	800	41	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	88	80	8	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	88	0	88	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	440	440	0	0	0