Share: 
CANEY FORK RD over BR OF CANEY FORK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.19389, -85.36444
37°11'38" N, 85°21'52" W
+37.19389, -85.36444
37°11'38" N, 85°21'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | CANEY FORK RD over BR OF CANEY FORK |
| Structure number: | 044C00006N |
| Location: | .05 MI W OF Cane ValleyRD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1965 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 63 [as of 2011] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 25.0 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $35,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2017 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
| April 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
| April 2015 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
| April 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
| August 2013 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 63 | 35.0 |
| April 2012 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 63 | 64.3 |
| April 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 33 | 64.3 |
| April 2008 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 33 | 64.3 |
| April 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 25 | 64.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 224 | 147 | 0 | 73 | 4 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 442 | 438 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211816
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211816