CANEY FORK RD over BR OF CANEY FORK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.19389, -85.3644437°11'38" N, 85°21'52" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CANEY FORK RD over BR OF CANEY FORK |
Structure number: | 044C00006N |
Location: | .05 MI W OF Cane ValleyRD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.7 ft. [4.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 15° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 63 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 25.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $35,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
April 2017 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
April 2016 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
April 2015 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
April 2014 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 63 | 25.0 |
August 2013 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 63 | 35.0 |
April 2012 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 63 | 64.3 |
April 2010 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 33 | 64.3 |
April 2008 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 33 | 64.3 |
April 2006 | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | Good | 25 | 64.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 224 | 147 | 0 | 73 | 4 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 442 | 438 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 |