BIG BRUSH CRK over UPPER BRUSH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.42722, -85.5791737°25'38" N, 85°34'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BIG BRUSH CRK over UPPER BRUSH CREEK |
Structure number: | 044C00018N |
Location: | 1.7 MI N OF JCT CR 5331 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 91 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
June 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53 | 60.4 |
April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53 | 60.4 |
April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 53.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 886 | 833 | 53 | 0 | 0 |