Share: 
BIG BRUSH CRK over UPPER BRUSH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.42722, -85.57917
37°25'38" N, 85°34'45" W
+37.42722, -85.57917
37°25'38" N, 85°34'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | BIG BRUSH CRK over UPPER BRUSH CREEK |
| Structure number: | 044C00018N |
| Location: | 1.7 MI N OF JCT CR 5331 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 91 [as of 2011] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 60.4 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
| June 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
| April 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
| April 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 91 | 60.4 |
| April 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53 | 60.4 |
| April 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53 | 60.4 |
| April 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 40 | 53.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 16 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joints | ||||||
| Open Joint | linear ft. | 16 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 886 | 833 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211819
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1211819