CANEY CREEK RD over CANEY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.40944, -84.6861138°24'34" N, 84°41'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CANEY CREEK RD over CANEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 094C00026N |
Location: | 2.6 MI.NE JCT CR 5131 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 18.7 ft. [5.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 22° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 43 [as of 2006] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 43 | 72.9 |
December 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 43 | 72.9 |
January 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 43 | 72.9 |
January 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 43 | 72.9 |
January 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 43 | 72.9 |
February 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 43 | 72.9 |
April 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 44 | 72.9 |
April 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 35 | 72.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 27 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 116 | 109 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 75 | 21 | 54 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 691 | 0 | 691 | 0 | 0 |