Share: 
RIGHT FORK BUFFALO over HARRISON BRANCH
Map
Coordinates:
+37.33083, -83.59833
37°19'51" N, 83°35'54" W
+37.33083, -83.59833
37°19'51" N, 83°35'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | RIGHT FORK BUFFALO over HARRISON BRANCH |
| Structure number: | 095C00029N |
| Location: | 3.2 MI-S.JCT KY 2024 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1996 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2006] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.6 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 55.6 |
| March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 55.6 |
| March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 77.8 |
| March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 77.8 |
| March 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 77.8 |
| March 2008 | Good | Very Good | - | Very Good | 50 | 77.8 |
| March 2006 | Good | Very Good | - | Very Good | 50 | 77.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 80 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 353 | 353 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1218186
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1218186