RIGHT FORK BUFFALO over RIGHT FORK BUFFALO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.32028, -83.5963937°19'13" N, 83°35'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RIGHT FORK BUFFALO over RIGHT FORK BUFFALO CREEK |
Structure number: | 095C00033N |
Location: | 5 MI. S. KY.2024 TERMINI |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
Total length: | 41.0 ft. [12.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 19° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 2005 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2006] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 49.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 20 | 49.5 |
March 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 49.5 |
December 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 49.5 |
March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 67.8 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 67.8 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 67.8 |
March 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 20 | 67.8 |
March 2008 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 67.8 |
March 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 20 | 67.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 185 | 0 | 185 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 780 | 780 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 51 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 |