+29.91286, -90.24916
29°54'46" N, 90°14'57" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US0090 over DRAIN CANAL
Structure number:022600051001312
Location:4.0 MI WEST OF US 90B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Total length:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,240 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:52.5 tons [47.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:78.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$400,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
July 201578.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO12240
August 201378.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO12240
September 201267.8FairGoodGoodFairFO13500
September 201167.8FairGoodGoodFairFO14820
November 201067.8FairGoodGoodFairFO17940
December 200967.8FairGoodGoodFairFO17880
December 200867.8FairGoodGoodFairFO18780
November 200734.8PoorGoodGoodSeriousSD24720
August 200634.8PoorSatisfactoryGoodSeriousSD22800
May 200534.8PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD21960
April 200434.8PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD22020
May 200234.8PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD19380
May 200020.4PoorSatisfactoryFairSeriousSD13614
January 199820.4PoorSatisfactoryGoodSeriousSD15076
December 199663.4FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO11644
August 199563.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO11415
March 199563.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO11137
August 199263.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO13757
May 199063.4FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO13757

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.390390000
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.2,3402,340000
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.7065500
Reinforced Concrete Pileeach55000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.9090000
Elastomeric Bearingeach1010000
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Raillinear ft.7807800