+29.91157, -90.22846
29°54'42" N, 90°13'42" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US0090 over DRAIN CANAL
Structure number:022600051002552
Location:2.8 MI WEST OF US 90B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Total length:78.1 ft. [23.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:12,240 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:52.5 tons [47.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:78.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$400,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201578.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO12240
June 201378.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO12240
June 201266.8FairGoodSatisfactoryFairFO13500
June 201150.8PoorGoodSatisfactoryPoorSD14820
June 201050.8PoorGoodSatisfactoryPoorSD17940
July 200950.8PoorGoodPoorFairSD17880
July 200850.8PoorGoodPoorFairSD18780
June 200733.8PoorSatisfactorySeriousSeriousSD24720
February 200633.8PoorSatisfactorySeriousSeriousSD21960
February 200533.8PoorSatisfactorySeriousSeriousSD22020
January 200433.8PoorSatisfactorySeriousPoorSD20160
May 200233.8PoorSatisfactorySeriousPoorSD19380
January 200119.4PoorSatisfactorySeriousPoorSD13614
January 199837.4PoorGoodPoorPoorSD15076
December 199653.4FairGoodFairFairFO11644
July 199537.4PoorGoodPoorFairSD11415
August 199453.4FairGoodGoodFairFO11137
August 199353.4FairGoodGoodFairFO12558
August 199253.4FairGoodGoodFairFO13757
September 199153.4FairGoodGoodFairFO13757

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.385385000
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.1,84801,84800
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.6562030
Reinforced Concrete Pileeach55000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.2727000
Elastomeric Bearingeach1010000
Fixed Bearingeach1010000
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Raillinear ft.7707700