Share:

CITYST over I 10

Map

Coordinates:
+29.99914, -90.18753
29°59'57" N, 90°11'15" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:CITYST over I 10
Structure number:022604501505711
Location:3.7 MI EAST OF LA 49
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:83.0 ft. [25.3 m]
Total length:1402.0 ft. [427.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1967
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:21
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:26,100 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:97.8 tons [88.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.9 tons [45.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:75.8
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$5,467,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
January 201775.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO26100
January 201573.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO46290
February 201376.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO20310
February 201175.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO25560
January 200975.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO26850
November 200674.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO36300
October 200574.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO35340
September 200376.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO37530
April 200072.9FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO39770
June 199872.1GoodGoodGoodGoodFO37812
June 199573.8GoodGoodGoodGoodFO40803
July 199273.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO43548
March 199073.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO43548