US0090B over R/R, CITY STS


+29.94812, -90.08356
29°56'53" N, 90°05'01" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:US0090B over R/R, CITY STS
Structure number:023602830800412
Location:.4 MI SOUTH OF I-10
Purpose:Carries highway overpass over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:177.2 ft. [54.0 m]
Total length:4481.2 ft. [1365.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:72
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:101,880 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.9 tons [27.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:72.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$17,475,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201672.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO101880
April 201471.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO98640
April 201271.9GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO90780
September 200871.9FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO69360
August 200671.9FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO65880
July 200471.9GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO64612
August 200271.9GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO64612
August 199875.7GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO65932
November 199237.0PoorSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactorySD54411
November 198637.0PoorSatisfactorySeriousSatisfactorySD54411