Share:

US0090 over CITY STS, I10 RAMPS, US9

Map 

Coordinates:
+29.94408, -90.07693
29°56'39" N, 90°04'37" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US0090 over CITY STS, I10 RAMPS, US9
Structure number:023602830800915
Location:.91 MI SOUTH OF I-10
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:212.0 ft. [64.6 m]
Total length:3667.2 ft. [1117.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1994
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:26
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:14,860 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:58.9 tons [53.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$14,301,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
December 201679.0FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO14860
December 201478.8FairGoodGoodSatisfactoryFO16440
January 201378.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactoryFO15130
June 200878.8GoodVery GoodGoodGoodFO11560
August 200678.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodFO10980
July 200497.8GoodVery GoodGoodGood-10768
August 200297.8GoodVery GoodGoodGood-10768
July 199899.7GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-10988