CITYST over I 610


+29.99535, -90.11599
29°59'43" N, 90°06'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CITYST over I 610
Structure number:023604503400491
Location:.5 MI EAST OF I-10
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Total length:1035.2 ft. [315.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:16
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:47,100 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:55.4 tons [50.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.6 tons [33.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:80.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$4,047,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201680.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO47100
February 201480.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO29610
February 201280.0FairSatisfactoryGoodGoodFO21270
February 201080.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodFO13890
February 200880.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22530
February 200680.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO27180
December 200380.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO26460
September 200080.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO22532
May 199880.0GoodGoodGoodGoodFO22532
July 199573.9GoodGoodGoodGoodFO24372
June 199276.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO25604
March 199076.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO25604