Share: 
Almonaster Ave over INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION
Map
Coordinates:
+30.00460, -90.02603
30°00'17" N, 90°01'34" W
+30.00460, -90.02603
30°00'17" N, 90°01'34" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Almonaster Ave over INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION |
| Structure number: | 023630003900161 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI.E. OF FRANCE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 147.0 ft. [44.8 m] |
| Total length: | 282.2 ft. [86.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 64.6 ft. [19.7 m] |
| Owner: | Other Local Agencies [25] |
| Year built: | 1919 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
| Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
| Number of main spans: | 22 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Movable - Bascule [16] |
| Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 35.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $850,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.0 |
| January 2016 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.0 |
| January 2015 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.0 |
| January 2013 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.0 |
| February 2011 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.0 |
| April 2009 | - | - | - | - | - | 35.0 |
| September 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | - | 66.0 |
| January 2007 | - | - | - | - | - | 32.0 |
| April 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | - | 58.0 |
| March 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | - | 48.0 |
| November 1999 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | - | 47.0 |
| October 1997 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | - | 47.0 |
| July 1995 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | - | 56.0 |
| August 1993 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | - | 56.0 |
| May 1991 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | - | 54.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1221715
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1221715