Share:

CITY STREET over CITRUS CANAL

Map

Coordinates:
+30.02945, -89.98056
30°01'46" N, 89°58'50" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CITY STREET over CITRUS CANAL
Structure number:023630018895871
Location:0.1MI.E OF BUNDY ROA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:79.1 ft. [24.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.4 ft. [12.0 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,000 [as of 1970]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:40.9 tons [37.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$330,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201761.0PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD1000
February 201560.7PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD1000
February 201360.7PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD1000
March 201160.7PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD1000
April 200987.8FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-1000
March 200787.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1000
June 200587.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1000
May 200387.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1000
December 200187.8FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory-1000
June 199959.7PoorFairGoodPoorSD1000
July 199759.7PoorFairGoodPoorSD1000
June 199558.7PoorFairGoodPoorSD1000
May 199374.8FairFairGoodFair-1000
June 199159.7PoorFairGoodPoorSD1000

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.70521800
Timber Pileeach35102320
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.135013500
Joints
Pourable Jointlinear ft.170017000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.1600201400
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.2,72002,72000