+29.94447, -89.95378
29°56'40" N, 89°57'14" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Structure number:024429567895721
Location:0.4 MI NE OF LA 39
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:7.9 ft. [2.4 m]
Total length:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:14°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:88.2

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Good7 out of 10-88.2
February 2015Good7 out of 10-87.9
February 2013Good7 out of 10-87.9
March 2011Good7 out of 10-87.9
March 2009Fair6 out of 10-87.9
March 2007Poor3 out of 10-43.9
April 2005Fair5 out of 10-76.9
April 2003Fair5 out of 10-76.9
April 2001Fair5 out of 10-76.9
January 2000Fair5 out of 10-76.9
September 1997Fair5 out of 10-76.9
August 1995Fair5 out of 10-76.9
October 1993Fair5 out of 10-76.9
October 1991Fair5 out of 10-73.9