Share:

WRENWOOD DRIVE over TRIBUTARY TO BRUSHY BAYO

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.39356, -93.75845
32°23'37" N, 93°45'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WRENWOOD DRIVE over TRIBUTARY TO BRUSHY BAYO
Structure number:040932236934551
Location:0.37 MI SO OF LA 526
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:5.9 ft. [1.8 m]
Total length:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2017 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Structural appraisal:Unknown [*]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Sufficiency rating:98.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
April 201798.0Fair6 out of 10--
April 201598.0Fair6 out of 10--
April 201398.0Good7 out of 10--
April 2011100.0Good7 out of 10--
March 2009100.0Good7 out of 10--
March 2007100.0Good8 out of 10--
March 2005100.0Good8 out of 10--
April 2003100.0Good8 out of 10--
March 2001100.0Good8 out of 10--
February 1999100.0Good8 out of 10--
February 1997100.0Good8 out of 10--