+32.43744, -93.86235
32°26'15" N, 93°51'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:040932262935171
Location:0.3 MI. SO. OF LA 51
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.4 ft. [11.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:62.7 ft. [19.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1969
Year reconstructed:1992
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,000 [as of 1979]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.6

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
April 201792.6Good7 out of 10-2000
April 201592.3Good7 out of 10-2000
April 201392.3Good7 out of 10-2000
April 201192.3Good7 out of 10-2000
March 200992.3Good8 out of 10-2000
March 200792.3Good7 out of 10-2000
March 200592.3Good8 out of 10-2000
March 200392.3Good8 out of 10-2000
February 200192.3Good8 out of 10-2000
March 199992.3Good8 out of 10-2000
February 199792.3Good8 out of 10-2000
January 199592.3Good8 out of 10-2000
March 199392.3Good8 out of 10-2000
April 199188.3Good8 out of 10FO2000