Share:

Jewella NB over AIRPORT DITCH

Map

Coordinates:
+32.43833, -93.79670
32°26'18" N, 93°47'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Jewella NB over AIRPORT DITCH
Structure number:040932263934781
Location:0.2 MI. SO.OF LA 511
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1972
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,178 [as of 1979]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:57.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$348,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2017857.1
March 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2017857.1
March 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair2017860.1
March 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
February 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 1999FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.6
March 1995FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.1
March 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.1
March 1991FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2017872.1

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.8070280
Reinforced Concrete Pileeach2020000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.144135090
Joints
Pourable Jointlinear ft.168016800
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.200200000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.2,80002,790100