DUDLEY DRIVE over OCKLEY DITCH
Map
Coordinates:
+32.47167, -93.7483032°28'18" N, 93°44'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | DUDLEY DRIVE over OCKLEY DITCH |
Structure number: | 040932283934491 |
Location: | 2.3 MI N OF LA 511 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Total length: | 42.0 ft. [12.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 34.5 ft. [10.5 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1988 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 1979] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 91.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.8 |
April 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
April 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
April 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
February 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
January 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
January 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 200 | 91.5 |
March 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 200 | 91.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 75 | 73 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 52 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 84 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,218 | 898 | 320 | 0 | 0 |