+32.11901, -91.70636
32°07'08" N, 91°42'23" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LA0015 over STOKES BAYOU
Structure number:582100260612911
Location:.7 MI NORTH OF LA 3210
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1959
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,180 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:57.3
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$327,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
October 201657.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO3180
October 201455.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO4680
January 201355.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO4560
February 201155.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO4680
February 200955.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO4620
August 200651.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4440
July 200551.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4320
October 200451.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4320
July 200351.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4320
September 200251.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4020
July 200151.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD3526
July 200051.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD3526
July 199952.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4175
April 199852.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4175
April 199752.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4175
April 199652.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4978
March 199551.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4895
January 199451.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4777
March 199352.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4175
February 199252.8PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD4175

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.8080000
Prestressed Concrete Pileeach88000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.8080000
Pourable Jointlinear ft.8080000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.6060000
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.2,4002,400000